Illinois Central Railroad v. Williams

27 Ill. 48

• Court: Illinois Supreme Court
• Decided: November 15, 1861
• Status: Published

Opinion

Caton, C. J.

As this action was brought under the statute, and the negligence charged, is not fencing the road, the declaration is defective in not stating that the place where the accident happened is not within a city, town or village, or at a road crossing, for at those places the company was not bound to maintain a fence, and.it was necessary to show affirmatively, that it was the duty of the company to maintain the fence at the particular place, by negativing all those provisions of the statute exempting it from fencing in particular places.

The court also erred in its instruction, as to what constitutes a town or village, under the statute. The instruction is this: “To constitute a town, city or village, there should be something more than simply a place or point at which people live. There must be a dedication of the streets, alleys, etc., to the public.” This was substantially telling the jury that no matter how many people lived at the place, or what business was done there, it could not be a town or village unless it was laid out and platted under our statute. Such is not the law. Any small assemblage of houses, for dwellings, or business, or both, in the country, constitutes a village, whether they are situated upon regularly laid out streets and alleys, or not. And the proof abundantly shows that this was a village. It was called St. Johns. There was at this point, a railroad station, a mill, a blacksmith shop, a store, and a grocery. The number of dwellings is not given, but the reasonable presumption is, that they were sufficient at least to accommodate the persons doing business in the village. But there was no proof that there were streets and alleys laid off and dedicated to the public, hence the jury were bound to find that St. Johns was not a village, according to the instructions of the. court. The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded, with leave to the plaintiff to amend his declaration.

Judgment reversed.