Illinois Central Railroad v. Jones

39 So. 493, 87 Miss. 489
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1905
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 39 So. 493 (Illinois Central Railroad v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Illinois Central Railroad v. Jones, 39 So. 493, 87 Miss. 489 (Mich. 1905).

Opinion

Whiteibld, 0. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The two points chiefly relied on for reversal are (1) that the evidence is insufficient to show any partnership arrangement between the Illinois Central Railroad and the Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad, such as to render either liable, and (2) that no special notice was given at the time the original contract was made of the important character of the shipment — that is to say, that the hulls were to be used for fattening cattle. A careful examination of the testimony satisfies us that, within the rule announced in Railroad v. Lamkin, 78 Miss., 502 (30 South. Rep., 47), there was sufficient evidence to send the case to the jury. As to the question of notice, it very clearly appears that, the partnership arrangement being established, the plaintiff did give special notice that the hulls were wanted for the purpose of feeding cattle, prior to each of the fourteen shipments, delay in delivery of which is complained of in this case. The legal proposition is thus satisfied by the testimony in the case.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Delta Table & Chair Co. v. Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad
63 So. 272 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 So. 493, 87 Miss. 489, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/illinois-central-railroad-v-jones-miss-1905.