Illinois Central R. R. v. Andrews

61 Miss. 474
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided April 15, 1884·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Cooper, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The failure of the defendant to interpose its defense in the magis[478] trate’s court did not preclude it from defending in the circuit court on appeal. Callahan & Co. v. Newell, ante 437.

Section 1627 of the Code of 1880, which authorizes the plaintiff who sues upon an open account- to make oath to the correctness of the account, and gives to such sworn account the character of evidence, is not applicable except in cases where the cause of action arose ex contractu. Miss. Central Railroad Co. v. Fort, 44 Miss. 423.

Reversed..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Illinois Central R. R. v. Andrews, 61 Miss. 474 (Mich. 1884).

61 Miss. 474 (Illinois Central R. R. v. Andrews) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gulf & Ship Island R. v. Wells Lumber Co.
72 So. 194 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1916)
Equity Savings & Loan Co. v. Boisfontaine
40 So. 241 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1905)