Illingworth v. De Mott
This text of 47 A. 1131 (Illingworth v. De Mott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The-- decree dismissing the bill of the complainant is affirmed, upon the grounds stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Emery, who advised it.
Whether the complainant, upon the facts proved, is entitled to any relief in equity, is not decided. The cause was tried upon the theory that defendants, as agents of complainant, had made secret profits out of a purchase complainant was induced to make; such was the issue presented by the pleadings, and it was properly disposed of by the vice-chancellor.
[673]*673For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Collins, .Hendrickson, Bogert, Adams, Vredenburgh, Voorhees—11.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
47 A. 1131, 61 N.J. Eq. 672, 1900 N.J. LEXIS 220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/illingworth-v-de-mott-nj-1900.