Illfelder Importing Co. v. United States
This text of 57 Cust. Ct. 834 (Illfelder Importing Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consist of sirens similar in all material respects to those the subject of Oxford International Corp. v. United States (55 Cust. Ct. 472, Abstract 69607), and that the items of merchandise marked “B” covered by the foregoing protests consist of rubber bulb horns similar in all material respects to those1 the subject of Sherwin International, Inc. v. United States (54 Cust. Ct. 466, Abstract 69382), the claims of the plaintiffs were sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
57 Cust. Ct. 834, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/illfelder-importing-co-v-united-states-cusc-1966.