Illfelder Importing Co. v. United States

57 Cust. Ct. 834, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1260
United States Customs Court·Decided December 5, 1966·No. No. P66/360·Published

Opinion

Rao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consist of sirens similar in all material respects to those the subject of Oxford International Corp. v. United States (55 Cust. Ct. 472, Abstract 69607), and that the items of merchandise marked “B” covered by the foregoing protests consist of rubber bulb horns similar in all material respects to those1 the subject of Sherwin International, Inc. v. United States (54 Cust. Ct. 466, Abstract 69382), the claims of the plaintiffs were sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Illfelder Importing Co. v. United States, 57 Cust. Ct. 834, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1260 (cusc 1966).

57 Cust. Ct. 834 (Illfelder Importing Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sherwin International, Inc. v. United States
54 Cust. Ct. 466 (U.S. Customs Court, 1965)
Oxford Int'l. Corp. v. United States
55 Cust. Ct. 472 (U.S. Customs Court, 1965)