Ill. Cent. R. Co. v. Houston

Mississippi Supreme Court

Ill. Cent. R. Co. v. Houston

9 So. 2d 788, 194 Miss. 607, 1942 Miss. LEXIS 162

CourtMississippi Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 5, 1942

DocketNo. 35043.

StatusPublished

This text of 9 So. 2d 788 (Ill. Cent. R. Co. v. Houston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ill. Cent. R. Co. v. Houston, 9 So. 2d 788, 194 Miss. 607, 1942 Miss. LEXIS 162 (Mich. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Smith, O. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Nothing in the evidence in this case justifies excluding it from the rule announced in Gulf, M. & N. R. Co. v. Holifield, 152 Miss. 674, 120 So. 750, approved and applied in a number of cases subsequent thereto; consequently it is governed thereby and the court below should have granted the appellant’s request for a directed verdict.

Eeversed and judgment here for the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith, O. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Nothing in the evidence in this case justifies excluding it from the rule announced in Gulf, M. & N. R. Co. v. Holifield, 152 Miss. 674, 120 So. 750, approved and applied in a number of cases subsequent thereto; consequently it is governed thereby and the court below should have granted the appellant’s request for a directed verdict.

Eeversed and judgment here for the appellant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 So. 2d 788, 194 Miss. 607, 1942 Miss. LEXIS 162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ill-cent-r-co-v-houston-miss-1942.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack