Ilic v. Rochester Gas & Electric Corp.

262 A.D.2d 1019, 691 N.Y.S.2d 834, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7230
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 18, 1999·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages arising from the interruption of gas service to his residential property. Supreme Court properly granted that part of defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment seeking dismissal of the claims for damages for the alleged loss of credit and financing, past carrying costs and future carrying costs on the property and plaintiffs lost earnings. Those claims for damages cannot be “reasonably traced to the event” and are not “independent of other causes” (Steitz v Gifford, 280 NY 15, 20; see, Apollo Steel Corp. v Melco Cranes, 202 AD2d 1049, 1049-1050). The court also properly granted that part of the motion seeking dismissal of the claims of plaintiffs wife, who has no interest in the property and is not a party to the contract between plaintiff and defendant (see, Sterritt v Heins Equip. Co., 114 AD2d 616, 617). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Galloway, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Green, J. P., Lawton, Wisner, Hurlbutt and Callahan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ilic v. Rochester Gas & Electric Corp., 262 A.D.2d 1019, 691 N.Y.S.2d 834, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7230 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

262 A.D.2d 1019 (Ilic v. Rochester Gas & Electric Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Barra v. County of Tompkins
125 A.D.3d 1237 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)