Ilia Fard v. Zeinab Hajizadeh
This text of Ilia Fard v. Zeinab Hajizadeh (Ilia Fard v. Zeinab Hajizadeh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed and Memorandum Majority and Concurring Opinions filed March 9, 2023.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-21-00537-CV
ILIA FARD, Appellant V. ZEINAB HAJIZADEH, Appellee
On Appeal from the 312th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2019-85225
MEMORANDUM CONCURRING OPINION While I concur in this court’s judgment and otherwise join the majority opinion, Husband did not timely preserve a complaint for appellate review regarding the trial court’s granting of his counsel’s amended unopposed motion to withdraw because Husband signed the motion, indicating that he “agreed and approved.” See Tex. R. App. P. 33.1(a) (preservation of appellate complaints). While Husband’s motion for new trial contains seven pages discussing his counsel’s withdrawal, Husband does not argue that his signature on the amended unopposed motion to withdraw was not consensual. Accordingly, he waived that issue.
/s/ Charles A. Spain Justice
Panel consists of Justices Zimmerer, Spain, and Hassan (Hassan, M., majority).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ilia Fard v. Zeinab Hajizadeh, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ilia-fard-v-zeinab-hajizadeh-texapp-2023.