Ilgenfritz's Appeal

5 Watts 25
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 15, 1836·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The grandchildren of an intestate take, by substitution, not through, but paramount to, their parent. The law designates them as persons to take a title derived, not from the parent, but immediately from the intestate. The property never was in the parent; consequently they did not inherit from him what he had not. If the administrators could come upon the fund in their hands as the representatives of the parent’s creditor, it is obvious that all his other creditors might do the same — a consequence not to be pretended. The court was, therefore, bound to dismiss the-petition.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ilgenfritz's Appeal, 5 Watts 25 (Pa. 1836).

5 Watts 25 (Ilgenfritz's Appeal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wattenbarger v. Payne
145 S.W. 148 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1912)
Powers v. Morrison
28 L.R.A. 521 (Texas Supreme Court, 1895)
Wallace v. Keyser
51 Pa. 493 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1856)