I.L.E. Corp. v. Zoning Bd., Appeals, No. Cv90 27 41 24 S (Oct. 21, 1992)

Connecticut Superior Court

I.L.E. Corp. v. Zoning Bd., Appeals, No. Cv90 27 41 24 S (Oct. 21, 1992)

1992 Conn. Super. Ct. 9531

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedOctober 21, 1992

DocketNo. CV90 27 41 24 S

StatusUnpublished

This text of 1992 Conn. Super. Ct. 9531 (I.L.E. Corp. v. Zoning Bd., Appeals, No. Cv90 27 41 24 S (Oct. 21, 1992)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

I.L.E. Corp. v. Zoning Bd., Appeals, No. Cv90 27 41 24 S (Oct. 21, 1992), 1992 Conn. Super. Ct. 9531 (Colo. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION This appeal was brought by I.L.E. Corporation through Samuel Mahigel, its president. The basis of the appeal is the denial by the Bridgeport Board of Zoning Appeals of an application by a prospective lessee of the plaintiff, for a Certificate of Approval for a general repairer's license to permit the general repair of motor vehicles on plaintiff's then owned property.

In all administrative appeals the first issue to be addressed by the court is the question of aggrievement. One requirement of aggrievement is that the appellant sustain its interest in the property involved throughout the course of its appeal. Craig v. Maher, 174 Conn. 8, 9. This the plaintiff failed to do. Counsel for plaintiff conceded that there has been a change of ownership in the subject premises and thus an absence of aggrievement by the appellant.

For the foregoing reasons, plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

STODOLINK, JUDGE CT Page 9532

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION This appeal was brought by I.L.E. Corporation through Samuel Mahigel, its president. The basis of the appeal is the denial by the Bridgeport Board of Zoning Appeals of an application by a prospective lessee of the plaintiff, for a Certificate of Approval for a general repairer's license to permit the general repair of motor vehicles on plaintiff's then owned property.

In all administrative appeals the first issue to be addressed by the court is the question of aggrievement. One requirement of aggrievement is that the appellant sustain its interest in the property involved throughout the course of its appeal. Craig v. Maher, 174 Conn. 8, 9. This the plaintiff failed to do. Counsel for plaintiff conceded that there has been a change of ownership in the subject premises and thus an absence of aggrievement by the appellant.

For the foregoing reasons, plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

STODOLINK, JUDGE CT Page 9532

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1992 Conn. Super. Ct. 9531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ile-corp-v-zoning-bd-appeals-no-cv90-27-41-24-s-oct-21-1992-connsuperct-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack