Ildefonso v. Farrell Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ildefonso v. Farrell Co.

112 A.D.2d 979, 492 N.Y.S.2d 643, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52193

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 12, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 112 A.D.2d 979 (Ildefonso v. Farrell Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ildefonso v. Farrell Co., 112 A.D.2d 979, 492 N.Y.S.2d 643, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52193 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant New England Engineering, Inc., appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Aronin, J.), dated May 17, 1984, which determined that said defendant’s motion was one to reargue rather than one to renew, as characterized by said [980]*980defendant, and referred it to Justice John A. Monteleone; and, (2) an order of the same court (Monteleone, J.), dated May 29, 1984, which denied defendant’s motion.

Appeals dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

By order dated April 30, 1982, Special Term (Monteleone, J.), denied appellant’s prior motion for summary judgment. Although appellant denominated the instant motion as one for leave to renew that prior motion, we agree with Special Term that it was properly one for reargument since it was not based upon any additional material facts. No appeal lies from an order denying reargument (see, Alessi v County of Nassau, 100 AD2d 561).

Special Term’s May 17, 1984 order of reference is likewise not appealable as of right under the provisions of CPLR 5701 (see, Hilligas v Veznedaroglu, 96 AD2d 721). Mangano, J. P., Brown, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant New England Engineering, Inc., appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Aronin, J.), dated May 17, 1984, which determined that said defendant’s motion was one to reargue rather than one to renew, as characterized by said [980]*980defendant, and referred it to Justice John A. Monteleone; and, (2) an order of the same court (Monteleone, J.), dated May 29, 1984, which denied defendant’s motion.

Appeals dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

By order dated April 30, 1982, Special Term (Monteleone, J.), denied appellant’s prior motion for summary judgment. Although appellant denominated the instant motion as one for leave to renew that prior motion, we agree with Special Term that it was properly one for reargument since it was not based upon any additional material facts. No appeal lies from an order denying reargument (see, Alessi v County of Nassau, 100 AD2d 561).

Special Term’s May 17, 1984 order of reference is likewise not appealable as of right under the provisions of CPLR 5701 (see, Hilligas v Veznedaroglu, 96 AD2d 721). Mangano, J. P., Brown, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

112 A.D.2d 979, 492 N.Y.S.2d 643, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ildefonso-v-farrell-co-nyappdiv-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack