Ilardi v. Ilardi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ilardi v. Ilardi

54 A.D.2d 922, 388 N.Y.S.2d 122, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14770

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 8, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 54 A.D.2d 922 (Ilardi v. Ilardi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ilardi v. Ilardi, 54 A.D.2d 922, 388 N.Y.S.2d 122, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14770 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In a matrimonial action, the plaintiff husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered [923]*923October 25, 1974, as amended by an order of the same court, entered March 4, 1975, as (1) directed him to pay alimony and a counsel fee, (2) determined the amount of money held jointly by the parties and (3) gave defendant credit for certain payments made by her. Judgment, as amended, affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. Plaintiff’s contentions of trial court error and abuse of discretion are not supported by the record on this appeal. Defendant’s request for a counsel fee for defense of this appeal is not properly made to this forum. Latham, Acting P. J., Margett, Rabin, Titone and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a matrimonial action, the plaintiff husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered [923]*923October 25, 1974, as amended by an order of the same court, entered March 4, 1975, as (1) directed him to pay alimony and a counsel fee, (2) determined the amount of money held jointly by the parties and (3) gave defendant credit for certain payments made by her. Judgment, as amended, affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. Plaintiff’s contentions of trial court error and abuse of discretion are not supported by the record on this appeal. Defendant’s request for a counsel fee for defense of this appeal is not properly made to this forum. Latham, Acting P. J., Margett, Rabin, Titone and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 A.D.2d 922, 388 N.Y.S.2d 122, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14770, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ilardi-v-ilardi-nyappdiv-1976.