Ikeal Wade Gardiner v. the State of Texas
This text of Ikeal Wade Gardiner v. the State of Texas (Ikeal Wade Gardiner v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-22-00113-CR __________________
IKEAL WADE GARDINER, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
__________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 1A District Court Jasper County, Texas Trial Cause No. 14049JD __________________________________________________________________
ORDER
The clerk’s record was filed on April 12, 2022, and the reporter’s record was
filed on November 14, 2022. On August 10, 2022, William Stephen Shires
substituted as retained counsel for appellant Ikeal Wade Gardiner. On December 14,
2022, the Court granted an extension of time to file the brief. On January 17, 2023,
we notified the parties that neither the brief nor a motion for an extension of time
had been filed, and we warned that unless we received the brief by January 27, 2023,
1 we would order the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why no brief has
been filed. As of this date the brief has not been filed.
We abate the appeal and remand the case to the trial court to conduct a hearing
at which a representative of the State, counsel for the appellant, and the appellant
shall be present. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(3). We direct the trial court to determine
whether or not appellant desires to pursue his appeal. If appellant desires to pursue
his appeal, we direct the trial court to determine why the brief of the appellant has
not been filed, why appellant’s counsel has not responded to the late notice from this
Court, and whether good cause exists to determine that retained counsel, William
Stephen Shires, has abandoned the appeal. If the trial court determines that counsel
has abandoned the appeal, the trial court shall determine whether the appellant is
indigent and whether counsel should be appointed for the appeal. See Tex. Code
Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 26.04(j)(2).
The record of the hearing, including any orders and findings of the trial court
judge, shall be sent to the appellate court for filing. The transcription of the court
reporter’s notes from the hearing and the recommendations of the trial court judge
are to be filed on or before March 10, 2023.
ORDER ENTERED February 8, 2023.
PER CURIAM
Before Golemon, C.J., Horton and Wright, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ikeal Wade Gardiner v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ikeal-wade-gardiner-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.