Ike v. Di Pronio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ike v. Di Pronio

96 A.D.2d 1134, 467 N.Y.S.2d 455, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19803

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 1, 1983

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 96 A.D.2d 1134 (Ike v. Di Pronio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ike v. Di Pronio, 96 A.D.2d 1134, 467 N.Y.S.2d 455, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19803 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

— Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum. Section 6-130 of the Election Law requires each signer of a designating petition to provide his “residence address.” Although we agree with petitioner that a post-office box number is not a residence address as required by the statute, the designating petition contains the required number of signatures after invalidation of the signatures providing only the post-office box number. (Appeal from order of Seneca Supreme Court, Henry, J. — Election Law.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Denman, O’Donnell and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum. Section 6-130 of the Election Law requires each signer of a designating petition to provide his “residence address.” Although we agree with petitioner that a post-office box number is not a residence address as required by the statute, the designating petition contains the required number of signatures after invalidation of the signatures providing only the post-office box number. (Appeal from order of Seneca Supreme Court, Henry, J. — Election Law.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Denman, O’Donnell and Schnepp, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

96 A.D.2d 1134, 467 N.Y.S.2d 455, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19803, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ike-v-di-pronio-nyappdiv-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack