Ikard v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Ikard v. State

135 S.W. 547, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 651

DecidedFebruary 8, 1911

StatusPublished

This text of 135 S.W. 547 (Ikard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ikard v. State, 135 S.W. 547, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 651 (Tex. 1911).

Pincite

Opinions

HARPER, J.

The Assistant Attorney General moves to dismiss this appeal on the ground that the recognizance is not sufficient to confer jurisdiction upon this court, in that the same does not recite that the appellant was convicted of a misdemeanor, nor does it state the amount of the punishment imposed by the verdict of the jury, as required by the statute. An inspection of the recognizance shows that it is defective in this respect.

Therefore the motion is sustained, and the appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HARPER, J.

The Assistant Attorney General moves to dismiss this appeal on the ground that the recognizance is not sufficient to confer jurisdiction upon this court, in that the same does not recite that the appellant was convicted of a misdemeanor, nor does it state the amount of the punishment imposed by the verdict of the jury, as required by the statute. An inspection of the recognizance shows that it is defective in this respect.

Therefore the motion is sustained, and the appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

135 S.W. 547, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ikard-v-state-texcrimapp-1911.