I.K. v. Department of Children & Family Services

District Court of Appeal of Florida

I.K. v. Department of Children & Family Services

869 So. 2d 579, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 17413, 2003 WL 22682064

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 14, 2003

DocketNo. 2D03-4513

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 869 So. 2d 579 (I.K. v. Department of Children & Family Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

I.K. v. Department of Children & Family Services, 869 So. 2d 579, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 17413, 2003 WL 22682064 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Contending that the circuit court should have granted a motion for disqualification, I.K., Jr., petitions this court for a writ of prohibition. We have jurisdiction. See Zuchel v. State, 824 So.2d 1044 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). We conclude that the order denying the motion for disqualification did not comply with Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.160(f). Therefore, we grant the petition and issue the writ of prohibition.

Upon the filing of a motion to disqualify, the circuit judge “shall determine only the legal sufficiency of the motion and shall not pass on the truth of the facts alleged.” Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.160(f). Here, in his seventeen-page order, the circuit judge went beyond merely determining the legal sufficiency of the motion and even refuted factual claims of bias made by I.K., Jr. When a judge has looked beyond the mere legal sufficiency of a suggestion of prejudice and attempted to refute the charges of partiality, he has exceeded the proper scope of his inquiry and on that basis alone established grounds for his disqualification. Bundy v. Rudd, 366 So.2d 440, 442 (Fla.1978).

Accordingly, we grant the petition and remand the cause with directions to grant the motion for disqualification.

Petition granted.

FULMER, DAVIS, and KELLY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Contending that the circuit court should have granted a motion for disqualification, I.K., Jr., petitions this court for a writ of prohibition. We have jurisdiction. See Zuchel v. State, 824 So.2d 1044 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). We conclude that the order denying the motion for disqualification did not comply with Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.160(f). Therefore, we grant the petition and issue the writ of prohibition.

Upon the filing of a motion to disqualify, the circuit judge “shall determine only the legal sufficiency of the motion and shall not pass on the truth of the facts alleged.” Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.160(f). Here, in his seventeen-page order, the circuit judge went beyond merely determining the legal sufficiency of the motion and even refuted factual claims of bias made by I.K., Jr. When a judge has looked beyond the mere legal sufficiency of a suggestion of prejudice and attempted to refute the charges of partiality, he has exceeded the proper scope of his inquiry and on that basis alone established grounds for his disqualification. Bundy v. Rudd, 366 So.2d 440, 442 (Fla.1978).

Accordingly, we grant the petition and remand the cause with directions to grant the motion for disqualification.

Petition granted.

FULMER, DAVIS, and KELLY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

869 So. 2d 579, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 17413, 2003 WL 22682064, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ik-v-department-of-children-family-services-fladistctapp-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack