I.J.S. Fabrics, Inc. v. Dan River, Inc.

437 N.E.2d 260, 56 N.Y.2d 755, 452 N.Y.S.2d 1, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3405
New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 13, 1982·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order should be affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (81 AD2d 525). We but add that, under the circumstances of this case, once the parties had agreed to the deletion of the warranty clause and the appellant on that basis had accepted respondent’s sales note, whether the respondent still retained and thereafter exercised its right to accept the sales note at its home office would be a question for the arbitrator(s) (cf. Matter of Prime [Jonas], 38 NY2d 570; Matter of Weinrott [Carp], 32 NY2d 190).

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

I.J.S. Fabrics, Inc. v. Dan River, Inc., 437 N.E.2d 260, 56 N.Y.2d 755, 452 N.Y.S.2d 1, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3405 (N.Y. 1982).

437 N.E.2d 260 (I.J.S. Fabrics, Inc. v. Dan River, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

International Tin Council v. Amalgamet Inc.
138 Misc. 2d 383 (New York Supreme Court, 1988)
In re the Estate of Cassone
469 N.E.2d 835 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
In re the Estate of Cassone
100 A.D.2d 606 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)