IH6 Property Georgia LP v. Segundo Adams

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 25-11403 Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

IH6 PROPERTY GEORGIA LP, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SEGUNDO ADAMS, and all others,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 1:25-cv-01897-AT

2

2 Opinion of the Court 25-11403

____________________

Before ROSENBAUM, GRANT, and ABUDU, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Segundo Adams, proceeding pro se, appeals from the district court’s April 14, 2025, order remanding his case to Georgia state court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We lack jurisdiction to review that order. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c)-(d); MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC v. Hanover Ins. Co., 995 F.3d 1289, 1294 (11th Cir. 2021) (explaining that remand orders for which our review is barred include those based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction). Additionally, Adams did not remove the case under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1442 or 1443, so no exception applies. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d); BP P.L.C. v. Mayor of Balt., 141 S. Ct. 1532, 1538 (2021).

Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdiction. No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-1 through 40-4 and all other applicable rules.