Iguanti v. Kronish

New York Supreme Court

Iguanti v. Kronish

52 Misc. 2d 306, 276 N.Y.S.2d 130, 1966 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1553

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 2, 1966

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 52 Misc. 2d 306 (Iguanti v. Kronish) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Iguanti v. Kronish, 52 Misc. 2d 306, 276 N.Y.S.2d 130, 1966 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1553 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Charles A. Loreto, J.

Plaintiff having obtained a judgment against the defendant, is proceeding by way of supplementary proceedings to satisfy his judgment. The latter has instituted a negligence lawsuit against a third party, defended by the Allstate Insurance Company.

Plaintiff here seeks by way of “ restraining notices” to restrain payment of the proceeds which may be paid to this defendant in that suit whether by settlement or by judgment. By this motion, the defendant seeks to vacate the restraining notices. CPLR 5222 provides for the use of restraining notices against property against which money judgments may be enforced. And CPLR 5201 (subds. [a], [b]) permit the enforcement of money judgments “ against any property which could be assigned or transferred, whether it consists of a present or future right or interest and whether or not it is vested ”.

The General Obligations Law (§ 13-101) forbids the assignment of a claim to recover damages for personal injuries. However, the Appellate Division in Grossman v. Schlosser (19 A D 2d 893) distinguished between an assignment and 11 proceeds ” of a personal injury case, holding that such proceeds are validly transferable. Therefore the proceeds of a personal injury action fall within the purview of CPLR 5201 and their transfer may be restrained. The motion is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Charles A. Loreto, J.

Plaintiff having obtained a judgment against the defendant, is proceeding by way of supplementary proceedings to satisfy his judgment. The latter has instituted a negligence lawsuit against a third party, defended by the Allstate Insurance Company.

Plaintiff here seeks by way of “ restraining notices” to restrain payment of the proceeds which may be paid to this defendant in that suit whether by settlement or by judgment. By this motion, the defendant seeks to vacate the restraining notices. CPLR 5222 provides for the use of restraining notices against property against which money judgments may be enforced. And CPLR 5201 (subds. [a], [b]) permit the enforcement of money judgments “ against any property which could be assigned or transferred, whether it consists of a present or future right or interest and whether or not it is vested ”.

The General Obligations Law (§ 13-101) forbids the assignment of a claim to recover damages for personal injuries. However, the Appellate Division in Grossman v. Schlosser (19 A D 2d 893) distinguished between an assignment and 11 proceeds ” of a personal injury case, holding that such proceeds are validly transferable. Therefore the proceeds of a personal injury action fall within the purview of CPLR 5201 and their transfer may be restrained. The motion is denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 Misc. 2d 306, 276 N.Y.S.2d 130, 1966 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1553, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/iguanti-v-kronish-nysupct-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack