Ignelzi v. Ogg Pet of: Ogg
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
PHILIP A. IGNELZI, INDIVIDUALLY, : No. 192 WAL 2017 PHILIP A. IGNELZI AND MARIANNE : IGNELZI, HUSBAND AND WIFE :
: Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court v. :
: :
OGG, CORDES, MURPHY AND IGNELZI, : LLP; GARY J. OGG; SAMUEL J. : CORDES; MICHAEL A. MURPHY, : INDIVIDUALLY; MICHAEL A. MURPHY : AND REBECCA MURPHY, HUSBAND : AND WIFE; OGG, MURPHY, AND : PERKOSKY, LLP; JOHN D. PERKOSKY; : AND ESQUIRE REALTY ASSOCIATES :
: :
PETITION OF: GARY J. OGG, MICHAEL : A. MURPHY AND REBECCA MURPHY, : OGG, MURPHY AND PERKOSKY, LLP : AND JOHN D. PERKOSKY :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 28th day of November, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of
Appeal is DENIED.
Justice Donohue did not participate in the consideration or decision of this
matter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ignelzi v. Ogg Pet of: Ogg (Ignelzi v. Ogg Pet of: Ogg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.