Ignaz Strauss & Co. v. United States

54 Cust. Ct. 439, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1896
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ignaz Strauss & Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 56 Cust. Ct. 54
United States Customs Court·Decided May 26, 1965·No. No. 69325; protests 64/15757, 64/22336, and 64/22337 (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” consist of miniature coffee or tea sets similar in all material respects to those the subject of B. Shackman & Co. and S. Stern Henry & Co. v. United States (28 Cust. 298, C.D. 1426), and that the items marked “B” consist of toy furniture sets the same as those the subject of J. M. Bernard & Co., Inc. v. United States (34 Cust. Ct. 145, C.D. 1695), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ignaz Strauss & Co. v. United States, 54 Cust. Ct. 439, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1896 (cusc 1965).

54 Cust. Ct. 439 (Ignaz Strauss & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United States
34 Cust. Ct. 145 (U.S. Customs Court, 1955)