Ignaz Strauss & Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Ignaz Strauss & Co. v. United States

39 Cust. Ct. 490

United States Customs Court·Decided November 13, 1957·No. No. 61343; protests 148626-K, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of earthenware articles composed of a nonvitrified absorbent body, not artificially colored and composed wholly of clay, provided that if the body of such ware is covered wholly or in part with an engobe or body slip, the engobe or body slip shall be considered a part of the body, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained. (Abstract 51831 followed).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of earthenware articles composed of a nonvitrified absorbent body, not artificially colored and composed wholly of clay, provided that if the body of such ware is covered wholly or in part with an engobe or body slip, the engobe or body slip shall be considered a part of the body, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained. (Abstract 51831 followed).

Ignaz Strauss & Co. v. United States, 39 Cust. Ct. 490 (cusc 1957).

Pincite

39 Cust. Ct. 490 (Ignaz Strauss & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.