Ignaz Strauss & Co. v. United States

30 Cust. Ct. 306, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1036
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ignaz Strauss & Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 28 Cust. Ct. 280
United States Customs Court·Decided December 23, 1952·No. No. 57005; protests 141688-K, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following The Fan Co. v. United States (25 Cust. Ct. 42, C. D. 1261), the items of merchandise marked “A” or “B,” stipulated to consist of silent butlers, composed wholly or in chief value of brass or copper, respectively, not plated with platinum, gold, or silver, chiefly used in the household, were held dutiable at 30 percent under paragraph 339, as modified by the trade agreement with Iran (T. D. 51067), and the items marked “C,” stipulated to consist of silent butlers, composed wholly or in chief value of pewter, not plated with platinum, gold, or silver, chiefly used in the household, were held dutiable at 25 percent under said paragraph 339, as modified by the trade agreement with the United Kingdom (T. D. 49753).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ignaz Strauss & Co. v. United States, 30 Cust. Ct. 306, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1036 (cusc 1952).

30 Cust. Ct. 306 (Ignaz Strauss & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fan Co. v. United States
25 Cust. Ct. 42 (U.S. Customs Court, 1950)