Ignash v. Murphy, Cook & Co.
94 A. 1058, 249 Pa. 223, 1915 Pa. LEXIS 705
Opinion
The nonsuit in this case was entered because it was manifest from the testimony that the plaintiff continued to work at a place which he knew to be dangerous, and voluntarily took the chance of being injured. He showed nothing making the defendants liable for the consequences of his. rashness in continuing at the dangerpus post. The judgment is¿ therefore, affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ignash v. Murphy, Cook & Co., 94 A. 1058, 249 Pa. 223, 1915 Pa. LEXIS 705 (Pa. 1915).
94 A. 1058 (Ignash v. Murphy, Cook & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Card v. Stowers Pork Packing & Provision Co.
98 A. 728 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1916)