Ignash v. Murphy, Cook & Co.
94 A. 1058, 249 Pa. 223, 1915 Pa. LEXIS 705
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 19, 1915
DocketAppeal, No. 379
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 94 A. 1058 (Ignash v. Murphy, Cook & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ignash v. Murphy, Cook & Co., 94 A. 1058, 249 Pa. 223, 1915 Pa. LEXIS 705 (Pa. 1915).
Opinion
The nonsuit in this case was entered because it was manifest from the testimony that the plaintiff continued to work at a place which he knew to be dangerous, and voluntarily took the chance of being injured. He showed nothing making the defendants liable for the consequences of his. rashness in continuing at the dangerpus post. The judgment is¿ therefore, affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Card v. Stowers Pork Packing & Provision Co.
98 A. 728 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1916)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
94 A. 1058, 249 Pa. 223, 1915 Pa. LEXIS 705, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ignash-v-murphy-cook-co-pa-1915.