Ignacio Cedillo Barcenas v. Eric Holder, Jr.

423 F. App'x 717
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMarch 22, 2011
Docket09-70967
StatusUnpublished

This text of 423 F. App'x 717 (Ignacio Cedillo Barcenas v. Eric Holder, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ignacio Cedillo Barcenas v. Eric Holder, Jr., 423 F. App'x 717 (9th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Ignacio Cedillo Barcenas and Maria Del Carmen Estrada De Cedillo, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to consider petitioners’ challenges to the agency’s denial of cancellation of removal and voluntary departure based on its discretionary determination that petitioners lack good moral character. 8 U.S.C. §§ 1229c(f), 1252(a)(2)(B)(i); Moran v. Ashcroft, 395 F.3d 1089, 1091 (9th Cir.2005), overruled on other grounds by Sanchez v. Holder, 560 F.3d 1028 (9th Cir.2009) (en banc).

Petitioners’ remaining contentions are not persuasive.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Martin Noe Moran v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General
395 F.3d 1089 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)
Sanchez v. Holder
560 F.3d 1028 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
423 F. App'x 717, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ignacio-cedillo-barcenas-v-eric-holder-jr-ca9-2011.