Iglesias v. Wal Mart Stores, Inc.

Fourth Circuit

Iglesias v. Wal Mart Stores, Inc.

542 F. App'x 296

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 21, 2013·No. No. 13-1927·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lourdes Iglesias appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint against Wal Mart Stores, Inc., and its Board members, individually, after a 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (2006) review. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. See Iglesias v. Wal Mart Stores, Inc., No. 2:13-cv-00331-MSD-LRL (E.D.Va. June 20, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lourdes Iglesias appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint against Wal Mart Stores, Inc., and its Board members, individually, after a 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (2006) review. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. See Iglesias v. Wal Mart Stores, Inc., No. 2:13-cv-00331-MSD-LRL (E.D.Va. June 20, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Iglesias v. Wal Mart Stores, Inc., 542 F. App'x 296 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

542 F. App'x 296 (Iglesias v. Wal Mart Stores, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related