Iglesias v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
This text of 473 F. App'x 362 (Iglesias v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Lourdes Iglesias seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing, without prejudice, her civil action against WalMart Stores, Inc., and denying her motion for reconsideration. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 [363]*363(1949). The orders Iglesias seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appeal-able interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
473 F. App'x 362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/iglesias-v-wal-mart-stores-inc-ca4-2012.