Iglesias v. Wal-Mart Stores East L.P.
This text of 542 F. App'x 295 (Iglesias v. Wal-Mart Stores East L.P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Lourdes Iglesias appeals the district court’s order denying her Fed.R.Civ.P. 60 motion to set aside judgment for fraud upon the court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Iglesias v. Wal-Mart Stores East L.P., No. 2:09-cv00008-MSD-FBS (E.D. Va. filed July 15, 2013; entered July 16, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
542 F. App'x 295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/iglesias-v-wal-mart-stores-east-lp-ca4-2013.