Iglehart v. Church

Illinois Supreme Court

Iglehart v. Church

35 Ill. 255

CourtIllinois Supreme Court

DecidedApril 15, 1864

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 35 Ill. 255 (Iglehart v. Church) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Iglehart v. Church, 35 Ill. 255 (Ill. 1864).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Walker

delivered the opinion of the Court:

The judgment in this case was confessed in open court, and the record shows that the court found that the power of attorney was proved. This was a fact that the court had jurisdiction to adjudicate and determine, and having found the fact, it is as binding and conclusive as any other within its jurisdiction. FTo error is perceived in this record and the judgment of the court below is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Chief Justice Walker

delivered the opinion of the Court:

The judgment in this case was confessed in open court, and the record shows that the court found that the power of attorney was proved. This was a fact that the court had jurisdiction to adjudicate and determine, and having found the fact, it is as binding and conclusive as any other within its jurisdiction. FTo error is perceived in this record and the judgment of the court below is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

35 Ill. 255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/iglehart-v-church-ill-1864.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack