Iglehart v. Church
35 Ill. 255
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the Court:
The judgment in this case was confessed in open court, and the record shows that the court found that the power of attorney was proved. This was a fact that the court had jurisdiction to adjudicate and determine, and having found the fact, it is as binding and conclusive as any other within its jurisdiction. FTo error is perceived in this record and the judgment of the court below is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Iglehart v. Church, 35 Ill. 255 (Ill. 1864).
35 Ill. 255 (Iglehart v. Church) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bunn v. Gardiner
18 Ill. App. 94 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1885)
Stein, Block & Co. v. Good
16 Ill. App. 516 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1885)