Igbinovia (Enoma) Vs. Warden

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided March 1, 2021·No. 81662·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

ENOMA UYG IGBINOVIA, No. 81662 Appellant,

vs. FILE JERRY HOWELL, WARDEN; AND THE STATE OF NEVADA, MAR 0 1 2021 Respondents. A- BROWN PREME COURT

BY

CLERK

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenging the computation of time served. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Jerry A. Wiese, Judge.

In response to an order of this court, the Attorney General advises that appellant has been released on parole. Thus, this appeal is moot. See Williams v. State, Dep't of Corr., 133 Nev. 594, 600 n.7, 402 P.3d 1260, 1265 n.7 (2017). (providing that when considering the computation of sentence credits that would make an inmate eligible for parole, "no relief can be afforded where the offender has already expired the sentence or appeared before the parole board on the sentence." (internal citation omitted)). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

, J.

Cadish

j.

Herndon

Sumem COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 4111g0.4 z osci to cc: Hon. Jerry Wiese, District Judge Enoina Uyg Igbinovia Attorney General/Carson City Attorney General/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 440D 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Igbinovia (Enoma) Vs. Warden, (Neb. 2021).

Igbinovia (Enoma) Vs. Warden (Igbinovia (Enoma) Vs. Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.