Igarashi v. Holma
Opinion
Electronically Filed
Supreme Court
SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
13-MAY-2026
09:31 AM
Dkt. 11 ODDP
SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI
MICHELLE IGARASHI and CLYDE IGARASHI, Petitioners, vs.
THE HONORABLE KARIN L. HOLMA, Judge of the Circuit Court of the First Circuit, State of Hawaiʻi, Respondent Judge,
and
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY AS TRUSTEE FOR HARBORVIEW MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2006-14, Respondent.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
(CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CASE NO. 1CC171000618)
ORDER DENYING PETITION AND MOTION FOR STAY (By: Devens, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, and Ginoza, JJ., and Circuit Judge Tomasa, assigned by reason of vacancy)
Upon consideration of the petition for writs of mandamus and prohibition filed December 11, 2025, the motion for stay filed December 11, 2025, and the record, Petitioners have not demonstrated a clear and indisputable right to relief. See
Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP v. Kim, 153 Hawaiʻi 307, 319, 537 P.3d 1154, 1166 (2023).
Nor have Petitioners shown that a stay is warranted. See Stop Rail Now v. DeCosta, 120 Hawaiʻi 238, 243, 203 P.3d 658, 663 (App. 2008).
It is ordered that the petition and motion for stay are denied.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, May 13, 2026.
/s/ Vladimir P. Devens
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Todd W. Eddins
/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza
/s/ Taryn R. Tomasa
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Igarashi v. Holma (Igarashi v. Holma) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.