Ifenatuora v. United States

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 27, 2011
Docket10-7556
StatusUnpublished

This text of Ifenatuora v. United States (Ifenatuora v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ifenatuora v. United States, (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7556

CALS IFENATUORA,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:10-cv-01091-PJM)

Submitted: April 12, 2011 Decided: April 27, 2011

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cals Ifenatuora, Appellant Pro Se. Melanie Lisa Glickson, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland; William Davis Moomau, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Cals C. Ifenatuora seeks to appeal the district

court’s order dismissing without prejudice his motion for

discovery. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and

collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P.

54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541,

545-46 (1949). The order Ifenatuora seeks to appeal is neither

a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral

order. Accordingly, we grant the Government’s motion to dismiss

the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We deny Ifenatuora’s

motion to grant access to evidence and dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ifenatuora v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ifenatuora-v-united-states-ca4-2011.