This text of IESI TX Corporation v. Community Waste Disposal, L.P. F/K/A Community Waste Disposal, Inc. (IESI TX Corporation v. Community Waste Disposal, L.P. F/K/A Community Waste Disposal, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
IESI TX Corporation v. Community Waste Disposal, L.P. F/K/A Community Waste Disposal, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
______________________________
No. 06-08-00074-CV
______________________________
IESI TX CORPORATION, Appellant
V.
COMMUNITY WASTE DISPOSAL, L.P.,
f/k/a COMMUNITY WASTE DISPOSAL, INC., Appellee
On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court No. DC-08-00254
Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.
Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, IESI TX Corporation, and Appellee, Community Waste Disposal, L.P., f/k/a
Community Waste Disposal, Inc., have filed with this Court a joint motion to dismiss the pending
appeal in this matter. (1) The parties represent to this Court that they have reached a full and final
settlement. In such a case, no real controversy exists, and in the absence of a controversy, the appeal
is moot.
We grant the motion and dismiss this appeal.
Josh R. Morriss, III
Chief Justice
Date Submitted: October 22, 2009
Date Decided: October 23, 2009
1. Originally appealed to the Fifth Court of Appeals, this case was transferred to this Court by
the Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann.
§ 73.001 (Vernon 2005).
at="true" Name="Normal"/>
In
The
Court
of Appeals
Sixth
Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
______________________________
No. 06-10-00238-CR
DEONTRA TERREL MASON,
Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 336th
Judicial District Court
Fannin County, Texas
Trial Court No. CR-10-23445
Before Morriss, C.J.,
Carter and Moseley, JJ.
Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DeontraTerrel Mason appeals from
his conviction in a trial before the court for assault on a family member, with
prior convictions.The trial court found
him guilty, found the alleged enhancements true, and sentenced him to twenty-five
years imprisonment.
Masons
attorney on appeal has filed a brief which discusses the record and reviews the
proceedings in detail. Counsel has thus provided a professional evaluation of
the record demonstrating why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to be
advanced.This meets the requirements of
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967); Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d
503 (Tex. Crim. App. 1981); and High v.
State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978).
Counsel
mailed a copy of the brief and a letter to Mason on June 29, 2011, informing
Mason of his right to file a pro se response and of his right to review the
record.No response has been filed.Counsel has also filed a motion with this
Court seeking to withdraw as counsel in this appeal.
We
have determined that this appeal is wholly frivolous. We have independently reviewed the clerks
record and the reporters record, and find no genuinely arguable issue.See Halbert v. Michigan, 545 U.S. 605, 623 (2005).We, therefore, agree with counsels
assessment that no arguable issues support an appeal.See
Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 82627 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
We
affirm the judgment of the trial court.[1]
Bailey
C. Moseley
Justice
Date
Submitted:September 12, 2011
Date
Decided:September 13, 2011
Do
Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In The
Court of Appeals
Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
______________________________
No. 06-08-00074-CV
______________________________
IESI TX CORPORATION, Appellant
V.
COMMUNITY WASTE DISPOSAL, L.P.,
f/k/a COMMUNITY WASTE DISPOSAL, INC., Appellee
On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court No. DC-08-00254
Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.
Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, IESI TX Corporation, and Appellee, Community Waste Disposal, L.P., f/k/a
Community Waste Disposal, Inc., have filed with this Court a joint motion to dismiss the pending
appeal in this matter. (1) The parties represent to this Court that they have reached a full and final
settlement. In such a case, no real controversy exists, and in the absence of a controversy, the appeal
is moot.
We grant the motion and dismiss this appeal.
Josh R. Morriss, III
Chief Justice
Date Submitted: October 22, 2009
Date Decided: October 23, 2009
1. Originally appealed to the Fifth Court of Appeals, this case was transferred to this Court by
the Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann.
§ 73.001 (Vernon 2005).
at="true" Name="Normal"/>
In
The
Court
of Appeals
Sixth
Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
______________________________
No. 06-10-00238-CR
DEONTRA TERREL MASON,
Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 336th
Judicial District Court
Fannin County, Texas
Trial Court No. CR-10-23445
Before Morriss, C.J.,
Carter and Moseley, JJ.
Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DeontraTerrel Mason appeals from
his conviction in a trial before the court for assault on a family member, with
prior convictions.The trial court found
him guilty, found the alleged enhancements true, and sentenced him to twenty-five
years imprisonment.
Masons
attorney on appeal has filed a brief which discusses the record and reviews the
proceedings in detail. Counsel has thus provided a professional evaluation of
the record demonstrating why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to be
advanced.This meets the requirements of
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967); Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d
503 (Tex. Crim. App. 1981); and High v.
State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978).
Counsel
mailed a copy of the brief and a letter to Mason on June 29, 2011, informing
Mason of his right to file a pro se response and of his right to review the
record.No response has been filed.Counsel has also filed a motion with this
Court seeking to withdraw as counsel in this appeal.
We
have determined that this appeal is wholly frivolous. We have independently reviewed the clerks
record and the reporters record, and find no genuinely arguable issue.See Halbert v. Michigan, 545 U.S. 605, 623 (2005).We, therefore, agree with counsels
assessment that no arguable issues support an appeal.See
Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 82627 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
We
affirm the judgment of the trial court.[1]
Bailey
C. Moseley
Justice
Date
Submitted:September 12, 2011
Date
Decided:September 13, 2011
Do
Not Publish
[1]Since we agree this case presents no reversible error,
we also, in accordance with Anders,
grant counsels request to withdraw from further representation of appellant in
this case.No substitute counsel will be
appointed.Should appellant wish to seek
further review of this case by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, appellant
must either retain an attorney to file a petition for discretionary review or
appellant must file a pro se petition for discretionary review.Any petition for discretionary review must be
filed within thirty days from the date of either this opinion or the last timely
motion for rehearing or for en banc reconsideration was overruled by this
Court.SeeTex. R. App. P.
68.2.Any petition for discretionary
review must be filed with the clerk of the Texas Court of Criminal
Appeals.SeeTex. R. App. P.
68.3 (amended by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Misc. Docket No. 11-104,
effective Sept. 1, 2011).Any petition
for discretionary review should comply with the requirements of Rule 68.4 of
the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.SeeTex.
R. App. P. 68.4.