IES Retail v. Lahaina Petroleum, LLC

CourtHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 16, 2026
DocketCAAP-26-0000056
StatusPublished

This text of IES Retail v. Lahaina Petroleum, LLC (IES Retail v. Lahaina Petroleum, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
IES Retail v. Lahaina Petroleum, LLC, (hawapp 2026).

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 16-APR-2026 08:17 AM Dkt. 25 ODSLJ NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

IES RETAIL, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LAHAINA PETROLEUM, LLC, Defendant-Appellant, and ALOHA PETROLEUM, LLC, Defendant-Appellee, and JOHN DOES 1-20; JANE DOES 1-20; DOE PARTNERSHIPS 1-20; DOE CORPORATIONS 1-20; DOE ENTITIES 1-20; AND DOE GOVERNMENTAL UNITS 1-20, Defendants.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT (CASE NO. 3CCV-XX-XXXXXXX)

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL FOR LACK OF APPELLATE JURISDICTION (By: Leonard, Presiding Judge, Hiraoka and Guidry, JJ.)

Upon review of the record, it appears we lack jurisdiction over Defendant-Appellant Lahaina Petroleum, LLC's appeal from the November 25, 2025 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order Granting Plaintiff IES Retail, LLC's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Liability for Counts I, II, and III (Regarding Purchase Option Agreements), Filed on August 20, 2025 [DKT. 92], because the circuit court has not entered a final, appealable order or judgment, see Hawai i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 641-1(a) (2016); Hawai i Rules of Civil Procedure Rules 54(b), 58; Jenkins v. Cades Schutte Fleming & Wright, 76 Hawai i 115, 119, 869 P.2d 1334, 1338 (1994); the Order is not appealable under the collateral-order or Forgay doctrines, see Greer v. Baker, 137 Hawai i 249, 253, 369 P.3d 832, 836 (2016) (discussing collateral-order doctrine and NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Forgay v. Conrad, 47 U.S. 201 (1848)); and the circuit court has not granted leave for an interlocutory appeal under HRS § 641- 1(b). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions and stipulations are dismissed. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, April 16, 2026.

/s/ Katherine G. Leonard Presiding Judge

/s/ Keith K. Hiraoka Associate Judge

/s/ Kimberly T. Guidry Associate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Forgay v. Conrad
47 U.S. 201 (Supreme Court, 1848)
Jenkins v. Cades Schutte Fleming & Wright
869 P.2d 1334 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1994)
Greer v. Baker.
369 P.3d 832 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
IES Retail v. Lahaina Petroleum, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ies-retail-v-lahaina-petroleum-llc-hawapp-2026.