Iengo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Iengo v. State

686 So. 2d 13, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5915, 1996 WL 293785

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 5, 1996

DocketNo. 94-03468

StatusPublished

This text of 686 So. 2d 13 (Iengo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Iengo v. State, 686 So. 2d 13, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5915, 1996 WL 293785 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s judgment and sentence. We strike, however, condition 9 of the orders of probation and community control because it is a special condition which was not orally pronounced at sentencing. Nank v. State, 646 So.2d 762 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). We also strike the words “at your own expense” from condition 10 for the same reason. Luby v. State, 648 So.2d 308 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

Affirmed as modified.

THREADGILL, A.C.J., and FRANK and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s judgment and sentence. We strike, however, condition 9 of the orders of probation and community control because it is a special condition which was not orally pronounced at sentencing. Nank v. State, 646 So.2d 762 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). We also strike the words “at your own expense” from condition 10 for the same reason. Luby v. State, 648 So.2d 308 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

Affirmed as modified.

THREADGILL, A.C.J., and FRANK and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

686 So. 2d 13, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5915, 1996 WL 293785, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/iengo-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack