IDS Property Casualty Insurance v. Wynter
Opinion
[638]*638Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leslie S. Lowenstein, Special Referee), entered on or about February 26, 2010, which denied petitioner’s application to stay arbitration of respondent’s uninsured motorist claim, unanimously affirmed, without costs. .
The record establishes that, at the time of the accident respondent was a passenger in an uninsured motor vehicle. He and the driver of the vehicle, a fellow employee, were on their way to a store where the driver intended to carry out a personal errand unrelated to work. Since respondent and the driver were not acting within the scope of their employment, workers’ compensation, if it is a remedy, is not respondent’s exclusive remedy (see Workers’ Compensation Law § 29 [6]; Macchirole v Giamboi, 97 NY2d 147, 150 [2001]). Concur—Gonzalez, P.J., Andrias, Catterson, Renwick and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
74 A.D.3d 637 (IDS Property Casualty Insurance v. Wynter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.