Idle Hour Tavern, Inc. v. Chairman of the New York State Liquor Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Idle Hour Tavern, Inc. v. Chairman of the New York State Liquor Authority

246 A.D.2d 650, 666 N.Y.S.2d 948, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 621

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 26, 1998·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article [651]*65178 to review a determination of the New York State Liquor Authority, dated October 29, 1996, which, after a hearing, found that the petitioner had violated Alcoholic Beverage Control Law § 65 (1), and imposed a monetary penalty.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, there was substantial evidence in the record to support the determination that the petitioner sold alcoholic beverages to a person under the age of 21 in violation of Alcoholic Beverage Control Law § 65 (1) (see, O.F.B., Inc. v New York State Liq. Auth., 212 AD2d 373; Matter of Northwood Foods Corp. v New York State Liq. Auth., 208 AD2d 633).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J. P., Altman, Friedmann and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article [651]*65178 to review a determination of the New York State Liquor Authority, dated October 29, 1996, which, after a hearing, found that the petitioner had violated Alcoholic Beverage Control Law § 65 (1), and imposed a monetary penalty.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, there was substantial evidence in the record to support the determination that the petitioner sold alcoholic beverages to a person under the age of 21 in violation of Alcoholic Beverage Control Law § 65 (1) (see, O.F.B., Inc. v New York State Liq. Auth., 212 AD2d 373; Matter of Northwood Foods Corp. v New York State Liq. Auth., 208 AD2d 633).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J. P., Altman, Friedmann and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Idle Hour Tavern, Inc. v. Chairman of the New York State Liquor Authority, 246 A.D.2d 650, 666 N.Y.S.2d 948, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 621 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

246 A.D.2d 650 (Idle Hour Tavern, Inc. v. Chairman of the New York State Liquor Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related