Ideker v. LaCrescent Nursing Center, Inc.

207 N.W.2d 713, 296 Minn. 240, 1973 Minn. LEXIS 1187
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedMay 18, 1973
Docket43844
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 207 N.W.2d 713 (Ideker v. LaCrescent Nursing Center, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ideker v. LaCrescent Nursing Center, Inc., 207 N.W.2d 713, 296 Minn. 240, 1973 Minn. LEXIS 1187 (Mich. 1973).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Writ of certiorari upon the relation of the employer to review a decision of the commissioner of manpower services. The issue is whether claimant should be partially disqualified from receiving unemployment compensation benefits on the ground that she was discharged for “misconduct” within the meaning of Minn. St. 268.09, subd. 1(1). The commissioner, affirming the appeal tribunal, held that claimant was not subject to any disqualification from receiving benefits. We reverse.

Claimant was employed as a nurse’s aid in a private nursing home. Knowing that the use of harsh or unkind language in dealing with patients could subject her to immediate discharge, she used extremely hostile and harsh language on two separate occasions in expressing her dissatisfaction with a bed-ridden male patient’s failure to control his bodily functions. The commissioner, as did the appeal tribunal, concluded that this did not constitute “misconduct.”

We believe that the facts do not justify that conclusion. The test for determining whether a claimant’s conduct constitutes “misconduct” is whether the conduct evinces a willful or wanton disregard for the employer’s interests or demonstrates a lack of concern by the employee for his job. Tilseth v. Midwest Lbr. Co. 295 Minn. 372, 204 N. W. 2d 644 (1973). Applying this test, we hold that the commissioner erred in concluding that claimant should not be subject to any disqualification.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hulse v. Job Service North Dakota
492 N.W.2d 604 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1992)
Ress v. Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Inc.
448 N.W.2d 519 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1989)
Gustafson v. IRC Industries
374 N.W.2d 594 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 1985)
Mankato Lutheran Home v. Miller
358 N.W.2d 96 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 1984)
Psihos v. R & M Manufacturing
352 N.W.2d 849 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 1984)
Flannigan v. Meadow Lane Health Care Center
347 N.W.2d 852 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 1984)
Campbell v. Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co.
345 N.W.2d 803 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 1984)
Flahave v. Lang Meat Packing
343 N.W.2d 683 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 1984)
Budding v. Iowa Department of Job Service
337 N.W.2d 219 (Court of Appeals of Iowa, 1983)
Auger v. Gillette Co.
303 N.W.2d 255 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1981)
Moeller v. Minnesota Department of Transportation
281 N.W.2d 879 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1979)
Claims of Heilman v. United Dressed Beef Co.
273 N.W.2d 628 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1978)
Booher v. Transport Clearings of Twin Cities, Inc.
260 N.W.2d 181 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
207 N.W.2d 713, 296 Minn. 240, 1973 Minn. LEXIS 1187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ideker-v-lacrescent-nursing-center-inc-minn-1973.