Ideal Bus. Partners, Inc. Vs. Lemper, D.O.

Nevada Supreme Court

Ideal Bus. Partners, Inc. Vs. Lemper, D.O.

473 P.3d 461

CourtNevada Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 14, 2020

Docket81173

StatusPublished

This text of 473 P.3d 461 (Ideal Bus. Partners, Inc. Vs. Lemper, D.O.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ideal Bus. Partners, Inc. Vs. Lemper, D.O., 473 P.3d 461 (Neb. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

IDEAL BUSINESS PARTNERS, INC., A No. 81173 DOMESTIC CORPORATION, Appellant, VS.

BRIAN A. LEMPER, D.O., AN INDIVIDUAL; BRIAN A. LEMPER, D.O., LTD., A NEVADA FILED CORPORATION; THE CENTER FOR OCT 1 4 2020 SURGICAL INTERVENTION, LLC, A ELIZABETH A. BROWN NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY CLERK OF SUPREME COURT BY COMPANY; AND AMERICAN DEPUTY CLERK REGENERATIVE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Respondents.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is an appeal from an "Order Denying Plaintiff s Request for Leave to Submit Opposition, Hear Argument on Motion, and Motion to Reconsider Order Granting Defendant's Motion to Dismiss." Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Mark R. Denton, Judge. Because the order appealed from did not appear to be substantively appealable, this court entered an order directing appellants to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant has responded and concedes the order is not a final appealable order, but asks this court to suspend the proceedings for 90 days to permit collateral action to play out in a different district court matter in the hopes that ultimately the matters can be consolidated. The appellate rules do not anticipate that parties should file a premature notice of appeal or that a premature notice of appeal should linger indefinitely on this court's

SUPREME COURT docket while the parties and the district court continue to resolve OF NEVADA

(0) I947A 0.10-377tz outstanding motions. NRAP 4(a)(6). This court lacks jurisdiction. Appellant may file an appeal from a final appealable order. This court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

J.

Ainisau4 J. Stiglich

f J.

cc: Hon. Mark R. Denton, District Judge Kathleen M. Paustian, Settlement Judge Ayon Law, PLLC Law Office of Steven H. Burke, D/B/A The 808 Firm Lipson Neilson P.C. Eighth District Court Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

IDEAL BUSINESS PARTNERS, INC., A No. 81173 DOMESTIC CORPORATION, Appellant, VS.

BRIAN A. LEMPER, D.O., AN INDIVIDUAL; BRIAN A. LEMPER, D.O., LTD., A NEVADA FILED CORPORATION; THE CENTER FOR OCT 1 4 2020 SURGICAL INTERVENTION, LLC, A ELIZABETH A. BROWN NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY CLERK OF SUPREME COURT BY COMPANY; AND AMERICAN DEPUTY CLERK REGENERATIVE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Respondents.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is an appeal from an "Order Denying Plaintiff s Request for Leave to Submit Opposition, Hear Argument on Motion, and Motion to Reconsider Order Granting Defendant's Motion to Dismiss." Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Mark R. Denton, Judge. Because the order appealed from did not appear to be substantively appealable, this court entered an order directing appellants to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant has responded and concedes the order is not a final appealable order, but asks this court to suspend the proceedings for 90 days to permit collateral action to play out in a different district court matter in the hopes that ultimately the matters can be consolidated. The appellate rules do not anticipate that parties should file a premature notice of appeal or that a premature notice of appeal should linger indefinitely on this court's

SUPREME COURT docket while the parties and the district court continue to resolve OF NEVADA

(0) I947A 0.10-377tz outstanding motions. NRAP 4(a)(6). This court lacks jurisdiction. Appellant may file an appeal from a final appealable order. This court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

J.

Ainisau4 J. Stiglich

f J.

cc: Hon. Mark R. Denton, District Judge Kathleen M. Paustian, Settlement Judge Ayon Law, PLLC Law Office of Steven H. Burke, D/B/A The 808 Firm Lipson Neilson P.C. Eighth District Court Clerk

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

473 P.3d 461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ideal-bus-partners-inc-vs-lemper-do-nev-2020.