Ide v. Phoenix Ins. Co.
This text of 12 F. Cas. 1168 (Ide v. Phoenix Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Illnois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Although the policies of the Phoenix Insurance Company all contain provisions requiring written and formal proofs of loss within thirty days thereafter, and barring all suits for losses not brought within one year after the happening of the losses, the agent of the company has sufficient authority to waive these formalities of proofs, and bind the company thereby; and the acts of Lathrop in this case amount to such a waiver. His acts and assurances in regard to the payment of the loss are also sufficient to bind the defendant, and to waive the clause barring suits not brought within one year after the loss.
The parol contract for insurance upon the complainant’s house was valid, and could be enforced without a policy. The receipt of the premium by the authorized local agent of the company is a receipt by the company, and a failure to issue a policy after the payment of the premium cannot be taken advantage of by the company in a court of equity.
A decree will therefore be entered in favor of the complainant that the defendant pay to him within thirty days the amount of the policy contracted for, interest, and costs of suit
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
12 F. Cas. 1168, 2 Biss. 333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ide-v-phoenix-ins-co-circtsdil-1870.