Idaho Potato Commission v. M & M Produce Farm & Sales, Dba M & M Produce
541 U.S. 1027, 124 S. Ct. 2066, 158 L. Ed. 2d 642, 72 U.S.L.W. 3673, 2004 U.S. LEXIS 3211
This text of 541 U.S. 1027 (Idaho Potato Commission v. M & M Produce Farm & Sales, Dba M & M Produce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Idaho Potato Commission v. M & M Produce Farm & Sales, Dba M & M Produce, 541 U.S. 1027, 124 S. Ct. 2066, 158 L. Ed. 2d 642, 72 U.S.L.W. 3673, 2004 U.S. LEXIS 3211 (2004).
Opinion
C. A. 2d Cir. Motions of Underwriters Laboratories Inc. et al. and Florida Department of Citrus/Florida Citrus Commission for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted. Certiorari denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Idaho Potato Commission v. M & M Produce Farm & Sales
335 F.3d 130 (Second Circuit, 2003)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
541 U.S. 1027, 124 S. Ct. 2066, 158 L. Ed. 2d 642, 72 U.S.L.W. 3673, 2004 U.S. LEXIS 3211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/idaho-potato-commission-v-m-m-produce-farm-sales-dba-m-m-produce-scotus-2004.