Idaho Comstock Co. v. Lundstrum

76 P. 762, 9 Idaho 785, 1904 Ida. LEXIS 93
CourtIdaho Supreme Court
DecidedApril 30, 1904
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 76 P. 762 (Idaho Comstock Co. v. Lundstrum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Idaho Comstock Co. v. Lundstrum, 76 P. 762, 9 Idaho 785, 1904 Ida. LEXIS 93 (Idaho 1904).

Opinion

SULLIVAN, C. J.

This is a motion to dismiss an appeal on the ground that the judgment entered by the trial court was not in accordance with the decision and mandate of this court in a former opinion in the same ease, which opinion is reported ante, p. 257, 74 Pac. 975. This court has carefully considered the judgment appealed from and find that it conforms-in every particular with the views expressed in the former opinion. That being true, the appeal must be dismissed, and it is-so ordered, with costs in favor of respondent.

Stockslager, J., concurs. Ailshie, J., took no part in the decision in this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Woodward v. Perkins
171 P.2d 997 (Montana Supreme Court, 1946)
Phillips v. Salmon M. & D. Co.
76 P. 1128 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
76 P. 762, 9 Idaho 785, 1904 Ida. LEXIS 93, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/idaho-comstock-co-v-lundstrum-idaho-1904.