Idaho Comstock Co. v. Lundstrum
76 P. 762, 9 Idaho 785, 1904 Ida. LEXIS 93
Opinion
This is a motion to dismiss an appeal on the ground that the judgment entered by the trial court was not in accordance with the decision and mandate of this court in a former opinion in the same ease, which opinion is reported ante, p. 257, 74 Pac. 975. This court has carefully considered the judgment appealed from and find that it conforms-in every particular with the views expressed in the former opinion. That being true, the appeal must be dismissed, and it is-so ordered, with costs in favor of respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Idaho Comstock Co. v. Lundstrum, 76 P. 762, 9 Idaho 785, 1904 Ida. LEXIS 93 (Idaho 1904).
76 P. 762 (Idaho Comstock Co. v. Lundstrum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Woodward v. Perkins
171 P.2d 997 (Montana Supreme Court, 1946)
Phillips v. Salmon M. & D. Co.
76 P. 1128 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1904)