Ida v. Borden's Farm Products Co.

247 A.D. 760
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 15, 1936
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 247 A.D. 760 (Ida v. Borden's Farm Products Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ida v. Borden's Farm Products Co., 247 A.D. 760 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages resulting through the alleged negligence of the defendant, caused by an alleged unruly, unmanageable and vicious horse, order denying motion for examination of the defendant and the driver of its horse and wagon reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs; the examination to proceed on five days’ notice at a time and place to be stated in the order. In our opinion, the appellants were entitled to examine the defendant through its officers and its driver of the horse and wagon in question in order to obtain testimony in support of their complaint. (See Enequist v. Brooklyn City R. R. Co., 216 App. Div. 730; La Bonte v. Long Island R. R. Co., 242 id. 844.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Masciarelli v. Delaware & Hudson Railroad
178 Misc. 458 (New York Supreme Court, 1942)
In re the Estate of Eckenroth
167 Misc. 632 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
247 A.D. 760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ida-v-bordens-farm-products-co-nyappdiv-1936.