Ida M. Picking v. State Finance Corporation

450 F.2d 881
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 14, 1971·No. 71-1600·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We have carefully considered the briefs and the record and conclude that oral argument is unnecessary. We, therefore, affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Picking v. State Finance Corp. et al., 332 F.Supp. 1399 (D.Md.1971).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ida M. Picking v. State Finance Corporation, 450 F.2d 881 (4th Cir. 1971).

450 F.2d 881 (Ida M. Picking v. State Finance Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

NCR Credit Corp. v. Underground Camera, Inc.
581 F. Supp. 609 (D. Massachusetts, 1984)
Coltharp v. Cutler
419 F. Supp. 924 (D. Utah, 1976)
Hinish v. State of Maryland
393 F. Supp. 53 (D. Maryland, 1975)
Thiess v. State Administrative Board of Election Laws
387 F. Supp. 1038 (D. Maryland, 1974)
Weiner v. Bank of King of Prussia
358 F. Supp. 684 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1973)
Picking v. Yates
288 A.2d 146 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1972)