ICS Yarn Corp. v. Incomex, Inc.
This text of 298 A.D.2d 232 (ICS Yarn Corp. v. Incomex, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered July 11, 2001, which denied defendants’ motion to disqualify plaintiffs attorneys, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Since defendants failed to demonstrate that the matters involved in both of the representational relationships at issue are substantially related, their motion to disqualify plaintiffs counsel was properly denied (see Jamaica Pub. Serv. Co. v AIU Ins. Co., 92 NY2d 631, 636). There is, in addition, no merit to defendants’ contention that plaintiffs law firm should be disqualified because one or more of its attorneys might be called as witnesses in the present litigation (see Talvy v American Red Cross, 205 AD2d 143, 152, affd 87 NY2d 826). Concur— Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Buckley, Sullivan and Ellerin, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
298 A.D.2d 232, 748 N.Y.S.2d 254, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9688, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ics-yarn-corp-v-incomex-inc-nyappdiv-2002.