ICON v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

ICON v. State

44 So. 3d 660, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 14186, 2010 WL 3714037

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 24, 2010·No. 5D09-1417·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Roy Lee Icon, III appeals his convictions of two counts of aggravated battery and one count of robbery with a firearm. Icon contends that convicting him of two counts of aggravated battery for a single act against a single victim violates double jeopardy principles. The State properly concedes error. Accordingly, we vacate one of Icon’s aggravated battery convictions. We find no merit in the other issues raised by Icon and affirm his other conviction of aggravated battery and robbery with a firearm.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.

SAWAYA, PALMER and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Roy Lee Icon, III appeals his convictions of two counts of aggravated battery and one count of robbery with a firearm. Icon contends that convicting him of two counts of aggravated battery for a single act against a single victim violates double jeopardy principles. The State properly concedes error. Accordingly, we vacate one of Icon’s aggravated battery convictions. We find no merit in the other issues raised by Icon and affirm his other conviction of aggravated battery and robbery with a firearm.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.

SAWAYA, PALMER and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

ICON v. State, 44 So. 3d 660, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 14186, 2010 WL 3714037 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

44 So. 3d 660 (ICON v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related