Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/ICON v. State

ICON v. State

44 So. 3d 660, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 14186, 2010 WL 3714037
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 24, 2010
Docket5D09-1417
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 44 So. 3d 660 (ICON v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
ICON v. State, 44 So. 3d 660, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 14186, 2010 WL 3714037 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Roy Lee Icon, III appeals his convictions of two counts of aggravated battery and one count of robbery with a firearm. Icon contends that convicting him of two counts of aggravated battery for a single act against a single victim violates double jeopardy principles. The State properly concedes error. Accordingly, we vacate one of Icon’s aggravated battery convictions. We find no merit in the other issues raised by Icon and affirm his other conviction of aggravated battery and robbery with a firearm.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.

SAWAYA, PALMER and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Riley Leonard Griffis, Jr v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015
Griffis v. State
163 So. 3d 1256 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
44 So. 3d 660, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 14186, 2010 WL 3714037, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/icon-v-state-fladistctapp-2010.