Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. v. Polar Electro Oy

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. v. Polar Electro Oy. Read the opinion of the Court — 656 F. App'x 1008
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided April 4, 2018·No. 17-1886·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

ICON HEALTH & FITNESS, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

POLAR ELECTRO OY, A FINNISH COMPANY, POLAR ELECTRO INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, Defendants-Appellees ______________________

2017-1886 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Utah in No. 1:11-cv-00167-BSJ, Senior Judge Bruce S. Jenkins. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

TYSON K. HOTTINGER, Maschoff Brennan Laycock Gilmore Israelsen & Wright, Irvine, CA, argued for plain- tiff-appellant. Also represented by LARRY R. LAYCOCK, DAVID R. WRIGHT, Salt Lake City, UT. ANTHONY J. FUGA, Holland & Knight, LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by JOHN P. MORAN, Washington, DC. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, O’MALLEY, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

April 4, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. v. Polar Electro Oy, (Fed. Cir. 2018).

Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. v. Polar Electro Oy (Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. v. Polar Electro Oy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.