I.C.E. International v. White, No. Cv93 0133985 S (Apr. 25, 1994)

1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 4212
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided April 25, 1994·No. No. CV93 0133985 S·Unpublished

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION The parties agree that the agreement of October 25, 1985 is a valid contract. That being the case, the legal construction of the contract presents a matter of law for the court. Dotolo v. Petrucelli, 152 Conn. 654, 656 (1965).

Contrary to the defendant's claim, the agreement does not differ from an agreement which is silent as to time of performance. To accept the defendant's argument would require an interpretation that the loan need never be repaid as long as the company operated as an ongoing business, regardless of the death CT Page 4213 or disability of the defendant. In this case, the law implies repayment within a reasonable time, which is of course a material fact which must be decided by the trier. Christopherson v. Blount, 216 Conn. 509, 513 (1990). Both motions for summary judgment are accordingly denied.

MOTTOLESE, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

I.C.E. International v. White, No. Cv93 0133985 S (Apr. 25, 1994), 1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 4212 (Colo. Ct. App. 1994).

1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 4212 (I.C.E. International v. White, No. Cv93 0133985 S (Apr. 25, 1994)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dotolo v. Petrucelli
211 A.2d 696 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1965)
Christophersen v. Blount
582 A.2d 460 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1990)