Icarom, PLC v. Howard County MD
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
ICAROM, PLC, Enterprise House Blackrock Company, Plaintiff-Appellant, No. 97-2576
v.
HOWARD COUNTY, MARYLAND, Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-94-2414-AMD)
Argued: March 2, 1999
Decided: April 16, 1999
Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
COUNSEL
ARGUED: J. Marks Moore, III, WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. William Fitts Ryan, Jr., WHITEFORD, TAYLOR & PRESTON, L.L.P., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Samuel M. Riley, WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER, Baltimore , Maryland, for Appellant. Howard R. Feldman, WHITEFORD, TAYLOR & PRESTON, L.L.P., Baltimore, Maryland; Barbara M.
Cook, Katherine L. Taylor, Louis P. Ruzzi, Ellicott City, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Icarom, PLC appeals an order of the district court declaring that Howard County, Maryland is entitled to coverage for contamination of groundwater underneath three landfills owned by the County pursuant to the terms of an insurance policy issued by Icarom. Finding no error, we affirm.
The County owns three landfills: Carr's Mill, New Cut, and Alpha Ridge. The groundwater underneath each of the landfills is contaminated as a result of the byproducts of decomposing waste; contamination at the Carr's Mill site may be exacerbated by hazardous waste leaking from drums illegally deposited on the property.
Icarom brought this declaratory judgment action seeking a determination of its duty to insure the County for losses due to the contamination of the groundwater beneath the landfills pursuant to a policy issued by Icarom covering all risks to real and personal property owned or leased by the County. As pertinent here, Icarom argued that the losses were not covered by the policy because they were not fortuitous .
Having had the benefit of oral argument and the parties' briefs, and after careful consideration of the record and the applicable law, we conclude that the district court correctly determined that the loss was fortuitous. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Icarom, PLC v. Howard County, Md., 981 F. Supp. 379, 387-90 (D. Md. 1997).
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Icarom, PLC v. Howard County MD (Icarom, PLC v. Howard County MD) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.