I.C. v. Zynga, Inc.
Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 I.C., ET AL., CASE NOS. 20-cv-01539-YGR 7 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO 8 VS. FILE SURREPLY; DENYING DEFENDANT’S REQUEST TO RESPOND TO SURREPLY; AND 9 ZYNGA INC., ADVISING PARTIES REGARDING HEARING 10 Defendant, Re: Dkt. Nos. 86, 87 1] D Currently pending in this putative class action are defendant Zynga Inc.’s renewed motion
5 B to compel arbitration and motion to dismiss, both of which are scheduled to be heard on July 27, 14 2021. (Dkt. Nos. 71, 72.) Also pending is plaintiffs’ administrative motion for leave to file a
3 15 surreply in order to address the Supreme Court’s recent decision in TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez, 16 141 S. Ct. 2190 (2021), which was issued after the filing of plaintiffs’ opposition and addressed by
7 Zynga in its reply. (Dkt. No. 86.) Zynga opposes plaintiffs’ motion for leave or, in the
18 alternative, requests leave to file a response to plaintiffs’ surreply. (Dkt. No. 87.) 19 The Court hereby GRANTS plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file a surreply and DENIES 0 Zynga’s request to respond thereto. The parties will have an opportunity to address the issue at the hearing. Indeed, the parties are advised that the hearing on the motion to dismiss shall focus || standing only. The Court shall address the merits (if necessary) upon resolution of the standing 23 |} issue. 4 This Order terminates Docket Number 86. 5 IT Is SO ORDERED. 26 7 Dated: July 23, 2021 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
I.C. v. Zynga, Inc. (I.C. v. Zynga, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.